论文部分内容阅读
虚报农民收入有两种情况:一种是把农民纯收入夸大后上报;一种则是把农民纯收入压低后上报。这两种上报数均与农民实际人均纯收入不符,所以称为“虚报”。笔者要说的是前一种,即夸大虚报。这种虚报,农民收入被无形增加几十至上百元,而村提留乡统筹费又是按人均纯收入提取,这就无疑要增加农民的负担。有一个村农民人均纯收入实际只有900元,而该村上报数却是1000元。该村农民人均负担为50元,未超过国家对村提留乡统筹费不超过上年农民人均纯收入5%的规定。但正是虚报了100元人
False reporting of peasant income has two kinds of situations: one is to exaggerate the peasants ’net income and report them; the other is to report the peasants’ net income down. The two reported numbers are not consistent with the actual per capita net income of farmers, so called “false report ”. I want to say is the former, that exaggerated false. This false report shows that the peasants ’income has been increased by an insignificant amount of several hundred to over a hundred yuan. However, the overall planning fee for retaining the village in Tuili Township is extrapolated from the net income per capita, which undoubtedly increases the peasants’ burden. The per capita net income of a village farmer actually only 900 yuan, while the village reported that the number is 1000 yuan. The per capita burden of peasants in this village is 50 yuan, which does not exceed the stipulation that the overall planning fee for rural monopoly in villages should not exceed 5% of the per capita net income of peasants in the previous year. But it is false that 100 people