论文部分内容阅读
主观证明责任逻辑在我国长期处于支配地位,其影响可能超出我们的想象,这可归结为六个因素:一是民事诉讼过程的行为特征;二是“举证”汉语表述的行为倾向;三是作为客观证明责任前提的“事实真伪不明”在主观证明责任逻辑中可以被“省略”;四是主观证明责任逻辑可与“客观真实”理念“和平共处”;五是主观证明责任逻辑是职权主义模式选择的产物;六是我们对客观证明责任逻辑的认识偏差导致其功能被低估。
The subjective burden of proof is dominant in our country for a long time, and its influence may be beyond our imagination. This can be attributed to six factors: one is the behavioral characteristics of civil procedure; the other is the behavioral tendencies of “proof” and “ Is the premise of the objective proof of responsibility ”the truth is not authentic “ in the subjective burden of proof can be ”omitted “; Fourth, the subjective burden of proof can be logical and ”objective truth " concept Fifth, the logic of the subjective burden of proof is the product of the selection of the mode of existentialism. Sixth, our understanding of the logic of objective burden of proof leads to underestimation of its function.