论文部分内容阅读
运用《中国学术期刊影响因子年报(CAJIFR)》的文献计量数据,以综合影响因子、综合即年指标和下载量、Web即年下载率等为代表,按学科门类、具体学科分析了主要期刊评价指标的学科差异性,发现基础科学类引用指标较高,人文社会科学类网络传播指标较高,综合性期刊总体指标偏低,同一学科门类下具体学科的评价指标差异明显。论文揭示出学科之间的实际差异,为多学科或跨学科期刊评价的综合判断与改进提供参考依据。
Based on the bibliometric data of “China Academic Journals Impact Factor Annual Report (CAJIFR)”, taking the comprehensive impact factors, the integrated annual indicators and downloads, the annual Web download rate as the representative, the author analyzes the evaluation of major journals by subject categories and specific disciplines The results showed that there were higher citation indexes in basic sciences, higher internet communication indexes in humanities and social sciences, lower overall indexes in comprehensive journals, and significant differences in evaluation indexes of specific subjects under the same subject category. Papers reveal the actual differences between disciplines, multidisciplinary or interdisciplinary evaluation of journals to provide a comprehensive assessment and improvement of reference.