论文部分内容阅读
海峡两岸和香港特区、澳门特区现行有关法院的审判制度,包括民事、刑事及行政诉讼的审判,各有不同的规定,尤其是诉讼审判制度的核心价值,分属英美法系国家的陪审团审判制及大陆法系国家的职业法官审判制。我国台湾地区已在试行人民观审制,大陆则因长久实施人民陪审制,就民众参与审判,已累积相当丰富可取的经验和绩效。基于中华文化广大的包容性,以及在海峡两岸实体法及程序法规定的法理原则及基本架构已渐趋相同的状况下,应将两种审判制度加以比较借鉴融合,有效落实,寻求出适合于大中华区的诉讼审判制度,尤其是要加快律师行业的开放。
The existing judicial systems of the relevant courts in the two sides of the Taiwan Straits, Hong Kong SAR and Macao SAR, including civil, criminal and administrative proceedings, each have different provisions, especially the core values of the litigation system. They are jury trials in common law countries System of civil law and civil law countries judge the system. Our Taiwan region has been piloting the people’s trial of the people. The Mainland has accumulated quite rich and desirable experience and performance as a result of long-standing implementation of the people’s jury system and people’s participation in the trial. Based on the vast inclusiveness of Chinese culture and the fact that the legal principle and basic structure as set out in the substantive law and procedural law on both sides of the Taiwan Strait have become more or less the same, the two judicial systems should be compared for reference and effectively implemented to find a suitable legal system Greater China litigation system, in particular, to speed up the legal profession’s opening up.