论文部分内容阅读
目的观察管腔状B-D测试装置的测试效果,并与传统B-D测试包进行比较。方法在规定的测试条件下,直接观察B-D试纸颜色变化,对两种测试装置的结果进行比较。结果经40次对比测试,在相同条件下管腔状B-D测试结果有13次不通过,传统B-D测试结果全部通过。管状测试装置13次不通过的原因是灭菌器质量问题。结论管腔状B-D测试装置的敏感性高于传统B-D测试包,管状测试装置更容易检测到冷空气的存在。
Objective To observe the test results of the lumen B-D test device and compare with the traditional B-D test package. Methods Under the specified test conditions, the color change of B-D test paper was directly observed, and the results of the two test devices were compared. Results After 40 times of comparison tests, the results of tube-shaped B-D test failed 13 times under the same conditions, and all the results of traditional B-D test were passed. The reason for the failure of the tubular test device 13 times is the sterilizer quality problem. Conclusions The sensitivity of the lumen-like B-D test set is higher than that of the conventional B-D test pack, which is more easily detectable by the tubular test set.