有判罚难免会有争议,而判罚要有依据,拍卖的依据便是《拍卖法》。有时候有了争议,然后就有了判罚,但是判罚之后仍然不能令各方满意,争议仍然存在。不止如此,该不该罚、什么时候罚、谁来罚、怎么罚……也是“争与罚”中纠缠不清的问题。今年以来,拍卖场上便出现了数次引起广泛争议和讨论的事件,它们或是老生常谈,或是新出现的问题,而有关鉴定试点单位的设立,虽然不是直接发生在拍卖场上,但也与拍卖息息相关。面对争议,只有找到问题所在,并尝试解决之,才是真正的发展之道。 It is inevitable that there will be penalties for controversy. The basis for the auction is the Auction Act. Sometimes there are disputes, and then there is a penalty, but after the penalties are still not satisfied with the parties, the dispute still exists. More than that, the question of whether to punish, when to punish, who to punish, or how to punish... is also a question that is tangled in “dispute and punishment”. Since the beginning of this year, there have been several incidents that have caused widespread controversy and discussion on the auction market. They are either commonplace or emerging issues. Although the establishment of the pilot unit for identification has not directly occurred on the auction market, it has also occurred. It is closely related to the auction. In the face of controversy, the only way to solve the problem lies in finding the problem and trying to resolve it.