目的探讨路边摊对唐山市民生活和城市管理的影响。方法采用自制路边摊对城市管理的影响问卷和自测健康评定量表对183名唐山市居民进行测查。结果①光顾路边摊频率不同的人在身体症状与器官功能因子和生理健康总分上差异具有统计学意义(F=13.670,5.722;P<0.01),光顾路边摊每周小于3次的高于每周3次的,每周3次的高于每周大于3次的;②光顾路边摊频率不同的人在正向情绪因子和心理健康总分上差异具有统计学意义(F=92.427,16.981;P<0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次的,每周3次的高于每周小于3次的;在心理症状与负向情绪因子上差异具有统计学意义(F=5.242,P<0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次的和每周小于3次的;③不同频率光顾路边摊的人在角色活动与社会适应上差异具有统计学意义(F=16.445,P<0.01),光顾路边摊每周大于3次的高于每周3次,每周3次的高于每周小于3次的;④调查中支持取缔路边摊的占12.50%,支持路边摊无条件解禁的占23.68%,支持路边摊应有条件解禁的高达46.05%。结论光顾路边摊对市民生活影响利弊共存,只要将路边摊合理规范化,路边摊是有存在的必要性的。 Objective To explore the influence of roadside stalls on the living and urban management of citizens in Tangshan. Methods A total of 183 residents of Tangshan City were investigated by self-made roadside stands questionnaire on the impact of urban management and self-rated health assessment scale. Results ① There was a significant difference in body symptom, organ function factor and physical health score between pavement stalls patronized by roadside vendors (F = 13.670, 5.722; P <0.01) Higher than 3 times a week, 3 times a week higher than 3 times a week; ②Patients who visited the street vendors with different frequencies had significant differences in positive emotional factors and mental health scores (F = 92.427, 16.981; P <0.01), patronizing pavement stalls more than 3 times a week more than 3 times a week, 3 times a week less than 3 times a week; in psychological symptoms and negative emotional factors The difference was statistically significant (F = 5.242, P <0.01), patronizing pavement stalls more than 3 times per week higher than 3 times per week and less than 3 times per week; ③ people frequented by street vendors at different frequencies were There was significant difference between role activity and social adaptation (F = 16.445, P <0.01), patronage of street vendors more than 3 times per week higher than 3 times per week, 3 times per week higher than less than 3 times per week ; ④Investigation, support for banning roadside stands accounted for 12.50%, supporting unbanned roadside stands for 23.68%, and support for roadside stands up to 46.05% for conditional lifting. Conclusion The patronage of roadside stalls has the pros and cons of coexisting on the life of citizens. As long as the roadside stands are reasonably standardized, roadside stands are necessary.