论文部分内容阅读
元和三年制舉,牛僧孺因反對削藩被選爲對策第一,是“放棄河北”的集體意識與反對削藩勢力對主戰派的抗爭;因此引起主戰的憲宗以及李吉甫、吐突承璀等人不滿。《舊唐書》此案相關記載中,憲宗態度比較曖昧;《通鑑》則對憲宗形象進行維護,將一切都轉嫁到李吉甫身上;《舊唐書》、《通鑑》遺漏、改寫了一些重要細節;《新唐書》則明確書寫了憲宗的不滿,代表了修史者的看法,是較爲合理的。《唐會要》、《太平御覽》、《册府元龜》的記載,較爲真實地還原了事件的經過。
Yuan and the three-year rule. The Umrah monk was chosen as the first countermeasure because of the anti-fan-cutting. It is the collective consciousness of “giving up Hebei” and the struggle against the war party by the anti-fan forces. As a result, Li Jifu, spit sudden Cheng Cui and others dissatisfaction. “Old Tang” records related to the case, the constitutional attitude is more ambiguous; “Tongjian” is the constitutional image of the maintenance, everything will be passed on to Li Jifu; “Old Tang”, “Tongjian” omission, rewritten some Important details; “New Tang Dynasty Book” clearly written constitutional discontent, on behalf of the history of history, is more reasonable. “Tang will be”, “Taiping Yu Lan,” “Book House Yuan Turtle” records, a more realistic reduction of the incident.