论文部分内容阅读
无权处分的法律效力是具有争议性的问题。在市场经济蓬勃发展的今天,交易的复杂性较高,无权处分经常会出现,有必要保护交易的安全。而我国合同法51条对无权处分的法律行为效力的规制,破坏了合同自由原则,不利于维护第三人的利益,有害于交易安全,同时违背法律制度的协调与统一。究其原因,主要是没有将物权行为理论研究清楚。所以买卖合同司法解释第三条的出现,代替了51条,打破了长期控制的不利局面,对我国市场经济的发展,并且对我国法律内部协调发展都带来了良好的作用。
The legal effect of disqualification is a matter of controversy. In today’s booming market economy, the complexity of the transaction is high, often without the right to dispose of it, and it is necessary to protect the security of the transaction. However, the regulation on the validity of the legal acts without the right to dispose in Article 51 of the Contract Law of our country has undermined the principle of freedom of contract, is not conducive to safeguarding the interests of the third party, jeopardizing the security of transactions and at the same time violating the coordination and unification of the legal system. The reason, mainly did not study the theory of real right behavior clearly. Therefore, the emergence of Article III of the judicial interpretation of the sales contract replaced the 51 article and broke the unfavorable situation of long-term control and brought a good effect on the development of the market economy in our country and on the coordinated development within our laws.