不遵守填平原则的惩罚性赔偿与民事程序存在着一定的冲突。从最佳威慑与彻底威慑的角度看,惩罚性赔偿实质上处于民事责任与刑罚之间,甚至有时与罚金刑无异,故需要提高对被告人的程序保护,其证明标准应当具有中间性,适用明确而令人信服的证明标准。从诉求正确的可能性、举证成本、风险收益的角度看,反映行为人主观过错程度的侵权行为的异常性的证明负担应当分配给原告。 There is a certain conflict between non-observance of the principle of compensation and civil procedure. From the perspective of the best deterrence and thorough deterrence, the punitive damages are essentially between civil liability and punishment, sometimes even with penalty. Therefore, it is necessary to improve the procedural protection of defendants. The standard of proof should be intermediate, Apply clear and convincing proof of standards. From the perspective of the possibility of claiming right, the cost of proof and the risk return, the abnormal burden of proof that reflects the infringement of the perpetrator’s subjective fault should be allocated to the plaintiff.