糖尿病足护理单对糖尿病患者足部评估与护理的效果及意义

来源 :中国医药指南 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:wangyifan_18
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的 分析针对糖尿病患者采用糖尿病足护理单进行足部评估与护理后的临床效果?方法 选取100例在本院2019年4月至2020年4月收治的糖尿病患者,对其进行足部评估后记录主要影响因素;将100例患者随机分成两组,分别实施常规护理(常规组50例)和糖尿病足护理单针对性护理(试验组50例),常规组采取的主要措施有及时解答患者提出来的问题,为其讲解药物用法用量等?试验组采取的主要措施有给予患者健康宣教,详细讲解疾病相关信息,包括疾病诱发因素?治疗方法?临床表现以及可能出现的并发症等;饮食护理,为每位患者计算出每日“,”Objective To analyze the clinical effect of foot evaluation and nursing with diabetic foot care sheet for patients with diabetes. Methods A total of 100 diabetic patients admitted to our hospital from April 2019 to April 2020 were selected. Their feet were evaluated and the main influencing factors were recorded. 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups, respectively, the implementation of routine nursing (routine group 50 cases) and diabetes foot nursing single targeted nursing (experimental group 50 cases), the routine group to take the main measures to timely answer the questions raised by patients, explain the drug usage and dosage. The main measures taken by the experimental group were health education, detailed explanation of the disease related information, including disease inducing factors, treatment methods, clinical manifestations and possible complications, etc. Dietary care, for each patient to calculate the total daily calorie intake, clear sugar, fat and protein ratio;To compare the clinical nursing effect and significance of the two groups of patients. Results One hundred diabetic patients all had different risk factors of diabetic foot disease, and the screening rate was 100%. After nursing, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose level and diabetic foot knowledge score of patients in the experimental group were better than those in the conventional group, and nursing satisfaction of patients in the experimental group (96.00%) was higher than that in the conventional group (82.00%), with significant differences between groups (P<0.05). Conclusion Foot evaluation and targeted nursing for diabetic patients can effectively understand the main pathogenic factors of diabetic foot and control the blood glucose level of patients.
其他文献
目的 探讨112例肺部感染合并呼吸衰竭患者实施综合性护理模式后的效果?方法 资料选择2018年1月至2019年1月在我院就诊的112例肺部感染合并呼吸衰竭患者,依照数字随机法将患者分为对照组与研究组,每组56例患者,分别采用常规护理与综合性护理,对比两组患者临床护理效果?结果 研究组患者的护理满意度评分各项评分均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);两组治疗后SAS与SDS评分均显著低于治疗前(P<0.05);研究组治疗后SAS与SDS评分显著低于对照组(P<0.05);研究组的患者治疗后生活质量各项评分均显著
目的 探讨罂粟碱注射液在缺血性肠病患者临床治疗中的应用效果?方法 将96例缺血性肠病患者分为观察组(采用罂粟碱注射液+常规治疗)和对照组(采用常规治疗),各48例,比较两组患者的治疗效果?结果 观察组患者的治疗有效率高于对照组(P < 0.05); 观察组患者的腹痛消失时间?便血消失时间?胃肠功能恢复正常时间比对照组更短(P < 0.05);观察组患者在护理后的焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分低于对照组(P < 0.05)?结论 在缺血性肠病的临床治疗中应用罂粟碱注射液,能够有效改善患者的临床症状,促进胃肠功能
目的 分析研究超声引导下髂腹下- 髂腹股沟神经阻滞联合局部神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的临床效果和应用价值?方法 选择我院收治的腹股沟疝患者100例,随机数字表法将患者分为对照组和观察组,均为50例,分别实施硬膜外麻醉及超声引导下髂腹下-髂腹股沟神经阻滞联合术中生殖股神经局部阻滞,比较不同麻醉方式的麻醉效果?并发症发生率?手术相关指标?术后不同时点VAS 评分等?结果 两种麻醉方式有效率对比无统计学意义(P > 0.05);与对照组相比,并发症总发生率?麻醉操作时长?术后首次进食时间及术后离床活动时间等