有人间我对西经和马经的倾向性,我说是后者。理由不在于微观认识的对与错,而是在于马经充分认识到了经济学的根本问题是“私有权”问题,而且一直强调这个问题,不像西经那样有意识地用一个暖昧的“稀缺”来替代它。所谓稀缺,不过是私有权分割的另 Some people have my inclination to the Western and Malaysian Scriptures. I said the latter. The reason is not that the micro-understanding of right and wrong, but rather that the horse by the full realization that the basic problem of economics is “private ownership, ” and has been emphasizing this issue, unlike the Western Conference so consciously with an ambiguous “Scarcity ” to replace it. The so-called scarcity, but the separation of private ownership of the other