论文部分内容阅读
撤稿,完全可以在合理的名义下被改造成一种巧妙地利用规则的缓兵之计,它赢得了竞争以及潜在收益,还有宝贵的时间。这种做法可说是,为了今天的收益而向未来道歉的透支战略近一段时间以来,科学网上发表了数篇关于学术文章被撤稿的报道,尤其是《2010年度生命科学十大论文撤销事件盘点》一文,更是把撤稿问题公开化。由此也引发了笔者的一些好奇与探究。笔者担心这种曾经庄严的负责任的行为——撤稿,有可能被某些别有用心的人利用,进而沦落为一种彻头彻尾的行为艺术。
Retirement can be completely reshaped into a subtle tactic of using rules to justify its name, gaining competition and potential benefits, as well as valuable time. This practice can be described as an overdraft strategy that apologizes to the future for the benefit of today. Recently, Science Online published several articles on the abolition of academic articles, especially the “2010 Top Ten Proceedings of Life Science Revocation Inventory ”one article, but also the issue of withdrawal draft open. Which also triggered some of the author's curiosity and exploration. The author fears that such a once solemn and responsible act - withdrawing manuscripts may be exploited by some ulterior motives and thus reduced to an out of order performance art.