马克思在《1844年经济学哲学手稿》中的“异化劳动与私有财产”一节最后部分,提出了关于异化劳动与私有财产何为最终根据的问题。这一问题又被学术界称之为“循环论证”问题。马克思在《政治经济学批判大纲》中通过历史叙事方式,解释了私有财产与异化劳动的起源及二者在现实化过程中的相互关系问题。从《大纲》中的历史叙事方式来看,《手稿》确乎陷入了循环论证。同时也可以说明,在唯物史观方面,《手稿》是一部不成熟的著作。 In the last part of the section “Alienated Labor and Private Property” in the Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844, Marx put forward the question of what constitutes the ultimate basis for alienating labor and private property. This problem has been called by academics as a “circular argument.” In the “Outline of Political Economics Criticism”, Marx explained the origin of private property and alienated labor and the interrelationship between the two in the process of actualization through historical narrative. Judging from the way of historical narration in The Outline, “Manuscripts” really fall into the loop of argument. At the same time, it can also show that “manuscripts” is an immature work on historical materialism.