论文部分内容阅读
“技术决定战术”。但从对战争结果的影响层面看,战术比技术更直接,更具有决定性。在未来高技术战争中,战术的作用将更突出。技术物化在兵器中,只有通过战术的激活,才有生命力对于未来战争,“技术优势”论认为信息制胜。这种观点有片面性,忽视了战争中技术的作用机制。就本质而言,技术是以物化形态(即武器装备)走入战争舞台的。它的存在形式不是“离子态”,而是“化合态”,具体表现出来的已不是技术本身,而是各种技术参数和性能指标。例如,导弹的射程、精度、弹道方程;飞机的
“Technical decision tactics.” But from the perspective of the impact on the outcome of the war, tactics are more direct and deterministic than technology. In the future high-tech war, the role of tactics will be more prominent. Technology is materialized in weapons. Only through the activation of tactics can there be vitality. For the future war, “technological superiority” theory holds that information wins. This view is one-sided and ignores the mechanism of technology in war. In essence, technology enters the stage of war in the form of materialization (ie, weaponry). It is not the existence of the “ionic state”, but “compound state”, the specific performance is not the technology itself, but a variety of technical parameters and performance indicators. For example, the range of missiles, accuracy, trajectory equation; aircraft’s