论文部分内容阅读
1995年3月公布的《中华人民共和国教育法》第25条第3款规定“任何组织和个人不得以营利为目的举办学校及其他教育机构”。1997年7月发布的《社会力量办学条例》第6条再次明确规定，“社会力量举办教育机构不得以营利为目的”。我们知道法规范的是人们的客观行为，不规范人们的主观思想，也没有办法规范。对于教育机构的举办者是否以营利为目的，无从认定。从更深层的原因来讲，人们的思想是绝对自由的，只有人们的行为才应受到限制。因此，不以营利为目的不应作为一条法律规范而存在，或者说不应作为一条法律规范单独存在。但作为一项政策是没有什么疑问的。
Paragraph 3 of Article 25 of the Education Law of the People’s Republic of China promulgated in March 1995 stipulates that “no organization or individual may hold schools and other educational institutions for profit.” Article 6 of the Regulations Governing the Running of Schools of Social Resources promulgated in July 1997 again stipulates that “social forces holding educational institutions shall not be for profit-making.” We know that legal norms are people’s objective behavior, do not regulate people’s subjective thinking, there is no way to regulate. For educational institutions sponsors for the purpose of profit, can not be identified. From a deeper reason, people’s minds are absolutely free, and only people’s behavior should be limited. Therefore, not for profit should not exist as a legal norms, or should not exist as a legal norm alone. But as a policy there is no doubt.