定义了区分服务网络中 AF PHB的公平性 ,指出对响应流和非响应流区别的不同只应针对其超出规范的流量 ,并且业务量的响应性的判定应根据其行为而不是仅靠协议类型 .通过仿真验证标记器 sr TCM和 tr TCM以及 8种映射机制是否能提供公平性 .在 DS网中 ,存在通过不区分流的响应性的标记算法可提供公平性的负荷范围 ,作者将其定义为公平区间 ,并对其参数配置进行了分析 Defines the fairness of differentiating AF PHB in service network, points out that the difference between response flow and non-response flow should only be aimed at its out-of-specification traffic, and the responsiveness of traffic should be judged according to its behavior rather than the protocol type The simulation verifies whether the markers sr TCM and tr TCM and eight mapping mechanisms provide fairness.In the DS network, there is a fairness of load range that can be provided by marking algorithms that do not discriminate flow responsiveness, and the authors define For the fair interval, and its configuration parameters were analyzed