目的了解武装警察官兵的心理状态和行为方式,探索其特点和相关因素,为进行心理辅导提供循证依据。方法2015年5月通过整群抽样选取武警某部595名现役官兵作为调查研究对象,采用自我症状量表(SCL-90)、艾森克人格量表和特质应对问卷进行问卷调查,评介分析其心理健康现状。结果本次调查有效问卷595份,均为男性,年龄16~37岁,平均(21.08±2.85)岁,军龄0~17年,平均(1.77±2.45)年。SCL-90量表中除敌对、躯体化外,全部明显低于军人常模,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),不同文化程度、独生子女和非独生子女间、不同婚姻状况的调查官兵SCL-90量表得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),6~20岁调查官兵总分及各因子得分均高于21~25岁和>25岁者,除强迫症状、人际敏感、忧郁、敌对因子外,不同年龄组总分和各因子得分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);1年及以下军龄者总分及各因子得分均高于军龄为1~5年和>5年者,不同军龄组间总分和各因子得分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);调查官兵艾森克人格问卷中精神质得分高于军人常模、内外向得分低于军人常模,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),是否独生子女、不同婚姻状况、不同年龄、不同军龄的三个维度得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而不同文化程度、不同职位分组则表现各异;特质应对方式得分高于健康人常模,差异有统计学意义,不同婚姻状况、不同年龄段、独生子女与非独生子女间应对方式得分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而不同职位、不同文化程度间积极应对方式得分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在相关关系中,官兵消极应对方式与SCL-90各因子有相关关系。特质应对方式问卷中积极得分与EPQ中P、N、L得分负相关,与E得分正相关;消极得分与EPQ中P、N得分呈正相关,与E、L得分呈负相关,且均有统计学意义。结论本次调查武警官兵总体心理状况较好,仍需做好武警官兵的心理健康促进,并根据不同人格、症状及应对方式进行针对性辅导。 Objective To understand the psychological status and behaviors of armed police officers and soldiers, explore their characteristics and relevant factors, and provide evidence base for psychological counseling. Methods In May 2015, a total of 595 active officers and soldiers of a certain armed police force were selected through cluster sampling to conduct a questionnaire survey using self-symptom scale (SCL-90), Eysenck personality scale and traits, Mental health status quo. Results There were 595 valid questionnaires in this survey. All of them were male, aged from 16 to 37 years, with an average of (21.08 ± 2.85) years and military age from 0 to 17 years (mean, 1.77 ± 2.45 years). SCL-90 scale in addition to hostile, somatization, all significantly lower than the military norm, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05), with different educational level, only child and non-only children, the investigation of different marital status of soldiers The score of SCL-90 was no significant difference (P> 0.05). The score of officers and soldiers in 6-20 years old and all factors were higher than those of 21-25 years old and> 25 years old. In addition to obsessive-compulsive symptoms, interpersonal sensitivity and depression (P <0.05). The scores of scores of military officers of one year or less and their scores were all higher than those of military age of 1-5 years and> 5 (P <0.05). There was a significant difference between the score of score and each factor (P <0.05). The score of mental health of officers and men in Eysenck’s personality questionnaire was higher than that of serviceman, (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the scores of three children with only child, different marital status, different ages and different military ages (P> 0.05), while those with different educational level and different positions The performance of different; trait style traits higher than the norm of healthy people, the difference was statistically significant There was no significant difference in coping style between single-child and non-only child in different marital status, age group, and different age groups (P> 0.05), but there was significant difference in the scores of active coping styles among different positions and different educational level (P < 0.05). In the correlation, the negative coping style of officers and soldiers was related to all the factors of SCL-90. The positive scores in the questionnaire of trait coping style were negatively correlated with P, N, L scores in EPQ and positively correlated with E score. The negative scores were positively correlated with P, N scores in EPQ and negatively correlated with E, L scores Significance of learning. Conclusion The overall psychological status of officers and soldiers of the Armed Police Corps in this investigation is good, and the mental health promotion of the officers and men of the Armed Police Force still needs to be improved. Guidance should be given according to different personality, symptoms and coping styles.