论文部分内容阅读
目的分析比较腹腔镜辅助结肠癌根治术与开腹结肠癌根治术后并发肠粘连的临床疗效。方法将我院结肠癌患者360例分为两组,实验组198例使用腹腔镜辅助结肠癌根治术,对照组162例使用开腹结肠癌根治术,观察并比较两组患者术后疗效及并发症状况。结果实验组手术时间、术中出血量、术后肠功能恢复时间、住院天数均明显少于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与开腹结肠癌根治术比较,腹腔镜辅助结肠癌根治术临床疗效好,术后并发肠粘连的情况也较少,相对安全可靠,值得临床运用。
Objective To compare and analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic-assisted radical mastectomy versus open gastrectomy for colon cancer. Methods 360 patients with colon cancer in our hospital were divided into two groups. 198 cases in the experimental group were treated with laparoscopy assisted radical mastectomy, 162 cases in the control group were treated with open colon cancer radical mastectomy. The curative effect and complications of the two groups were observed and compared Symptoms. Results The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative intestinal function recovery time and hospitalization days in the experimental group were significantly less than those in the control group (P <0.05). Conclusions Compared with the radical mastectomy of open colon cancer, laparoscopic-assisted radical resection of colon cancer has good clinical curative effect and less postoperative intestinal adhesion, which is relatively safe and reliable and worthy of clinical application.