论文部分内容阅读
作为当下哲学研究水平体现的教科书范式,不但体现了教科书撰写者学术水平的创新,也体现着中国马克思主义哲学研究水平的创新和中国哲学研究水平的创新。从教科书研究范式的特点和创新驱动等内在逻辑来看,教科书研究范式存在着教科书研究范式的哲学原理的普适性与原理阐述的历史性之间的矛盾、哲学理论的相对真理性与绝对真理性之间的矛盾、教科书作者的理解与人民群众对教科书普遍认同之间的矛盾和教科书书写的学术性与党和政府对教科书意识形态性要求之间的矛盾。同时,教科书研究范式还存在至少五个方面的叙述局限,即文本叙述的时代性局限,经典作家观点与当下哲学语言之间差异的局限,经典作家对相关领域的问题没有关注的原理空场局限,当代哲学研究成果的大众化理论概况的局限,实践理论的及时性、有效性和科学性总结的局限。
As the textbook paradigm reflected in the current philosophical research level, it not only reflects the academic level of textbook writers innovation, but also reflects the Chinese Marxist philosophy of the level of innovation and Chinese philosophy of the level of innovation. In view of the inherent logic of the textbook research paradigm and its innovation driven, the research paradigm of textbooks has the contradiction between the universality of philosophical principles of textbook research paradigm and the historical elaboration of philosophical theories, the relative truth and the absolute truth of philosophical theories The contradiction between the nature of the textbook, the comprehension of the author of the textbook and the general acceptance of the textbooks by the masses of people and the contradiction between the academicity of the textbook writing and the requirement of ideology of the textbooks by the party and the government. At the same time, there are at least five narrative limitations in the research paradigm of textbooks, that is, the limitation of the text of the time, the limitation of the differences between the classical writer’s point of view and the present philosophical language, the principle that classical writers have no concern about the problems in related fields The limitations of the general situation of the popularization of the research results of contemporary philosophy, the timeliness, effectiveness and scientificalness of the practical theory.