论文部分内容阅读
司法机关及其工作人员的“公”与“私”之间的矛盾是法律评价活动的基本矛盾。法律评价活动中的悖论与主体的责任相联系。司法机关及其工作人员不仅有着自身的利益,而且担负着相应的社会责任。当“私”成为矛盾运动的主要方面,司法机关就不是社会主体的现实主体,但却是社会主体的现实的责任主体。司法机关作为现实的责任主体所承担的责任,在实际上总要由社会的全体成员来承担,由此就产生了法律评价活动中的悖论。言论自由和制度反腐是解决这个悖论的重要途径。
The contradiction between “public” and “private” judicial organs and their staff is the basic contradiction of legal evaluation activities. The paradox in legal evaluation activities is related to the responsibility of the subject. The judiciary and its staff not only have their own interests, but also bear the corresponding social responsibility. When “private ” becomes the main aspect of the contradictory movement, the judiciary is not the real subject of the social subject, but it is the main responsibility of the reality of the social subject. The fact that the responsibility of the judiciary as the main body of responsibility in reality always needs to be borne by all the members of society results in a paradox in legal evaluation activities. Freedom of speech and system of anti-corruption are important ways to solve this paradox.