论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨胺碘酮治疗急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常的临床效果及价值。方法选取滨海新区汉沽中医医院在2015年1月-2016年1月间收治的46例急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常的患者为研究对象,按照时间顺序分为对照组和观察组各23例。观察组给予胺碘酮治疗,对照组给予利多卡因治疗,观察对比两种治疗方法的临床效果。结果观察组治疗总有效率为95.65%,明显高于对照组的73.91%,且患者的不良反应发生率较低,平均复律时间较短,两组数据差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论急性心肌梗死后室性心律失常患者给予胺碘酮治疗效果显著,患者满意度高,值得临床推广应用。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect and value of amiodarone on ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction. Methods Forty-six patients with ventricular arrhythmias after acute myocardial infarction were enrolled in Hangu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Binhai New Area from January 2015 to January 2016. The patients were divided into control group and observation group according to time sequence. The observation group was treated with amiodarone, and the control group was given lidocaine. The clinical effects of the two treatment methods were observed and compared. Results The total effective rate in the observation group was 95.65%, which was significantly higher than that in the control group (73.91%). The incidence of adverse reactions was lower and the average duration of the cardioversion was shorter. There was significant difference between the two groups (P <0.05) . Conclusion Amiodarone is effective in patients with ventricular arrhythmia after acute myocardial infarction. The patient satisfaction is high, which is worthy of clinical application.