21世纪初,中国文艺界围绕米勒的“文学终结论”展开了激烈的争鸣,或反对,或赞成,或质疑。这一争鸣是由多种因素促成的,既有理论旅行的因素,也包含文艺理论界对学科的反思,同时也是对中国本土文学迅速边缘化这一刺激的反应。因此,争鸣过程中出现了种种的错位,但总的来说是富有成果的,主要表现在下述共识的达成:“文艺终结论是从 In the early 21st century, the Chinese literary and art circles fiercely contend, oppose, approve, or question Miller’s ”End of Literature“. This argument is prompted by a variety of factors, not only the factors of theoretical travel, but also the reflections of disciplines by literary theorists and at the same time the reaction to the stimulus of the rapid marginalization of Chinese native literature. Therefore, there are various kinds of dislocations in the process of contention, but in general they are fruitful and are mainly manifested in the following consensus: ”Literary conclusion is from