论文部分内容阅读
目的对比使用氨溴索进行空气压缩雾化吸入与超声雾化吸入对学龄前儿童支气管肺炎的疗效和依从性,探讨最佳雾化吸入方式。方法将120例支气管肺炎随机分为空气压缩雾化组和超声雾化组各60例,两组雾化药物及其他治疗相同。结果空气压缩雾化组症状、体征改善时间,住院天数均较超声组缩短(P<0.01),且患儿接受雾化吸入时情绪反应表明空气压缩组依从性更高。结论氨溴索空气压缩雾化对支气管肺炎患儿治疗效果佳,患儿感觉舒适,易于接受,优于超声雾化组。
Objective To compare the efficacy and compliance of ambroxol inhalation with air compression atomization inhalation and ultrasonic atomization inhalation on bronchopneumonia in preschool children and to explore the best way of inhalation. Methods 120 cases of bronchial pneumonia were randomly divided into air compression atomization group and ultrasonic atomization group of 60 cases, the two groups of atomization drugs and other treatment the same. Results The symptoms of air compression atomization group, the time of symptom improvement and hospital stay were shorter than that of the ultrasound group (P <0.01). The emotional response of the children receiving inhalation of aerosol showed that the air compression group had higher compliance. Conclusion Ambroxol air compression atomization is effective in treating children with bronchopneumonia. The children feel comfortable and easy to accept, which is better than ultrasonic atomization group.