十五、关于预见性把违约方的赔偿责任限于他在订立合同时理应预见的合理范围之内，其理自明，无需解释。问题在于，何为“理应预见”？对此可能作出缩小的解释与应用，更可能作出膨胀的解释与应用。将近150年前著名的Hadl一诉Baxcndalc一案首次作出了可被称为关于“一般的”和? 15. In the case of predictability, to limit the liability of the defaulting party to the reasonable extent that he should have foreseen in entering into the contract, it is self-evident and need not be explained. The question is, what is “supposed to foresee”? This may be made to reduce the interpretation and application, more likely to make expansive explanations and applications. The famous case of Hadl v. Baxcndalc nearly 150 years ago made the first case that could be called “general” and?