论文部分内容阅读
本文主要就乌洛候的文献记载、名称含义、与室韦的关系、地理分布及流向等问题提出了看法，认为《魏书·乌洛侯传》是研究早期乌洛侯历史的基本史料，《通典》、《旧唐书》和《唐会要》中新增入的唐代乌洛侯史料有一定价值，《北史》、《太平寰宇记》和《新唐书》记载的乌洛侯内容都是抄录的前代史书，价值不大。从史料分析，《魏书》记载的室韦包括了乌洛侯，东魏以来的中原人已将乌洛侯看作是室韦的一部分。南北朝至唐代，乌洛侯居地有所变迁，《魏书》记载的乌洛侯人活动在甘河、雅鲁河之间，《旧唐书》记载的乌洛侯人南迁至洮儿河与霍林河之间。缺乏文献根据，单纯从对音角度得出的乌洛侯的名称含义及其与后来古代部落、现代民族关系的结论，是难以取信于人的。任意对音的作法，有悖于历史研究的科学性和严肃性，是不可取的。
This paper mainly puts forward the opinions on the literature, the meaning of the name, the relationship with Wei and Wei, the geographical distribution and the flow direction, and holds that “Wei Shu Hou Lu Hou Hou” is the basic historical material for studying the history of Urolu in the early period, The historical data of Urloh Hou in the Tang Dynasty, which were newly added in Tongdian, Old Tang Book and Tang Hui Yao, are of some value. The records of the history of the Northern History, Taiping Universe and New Tang Book Luo Hou content are copied from the previous generation of history books, little value. From the historical data, Shi Wei, recorded in Wei Shu, included Uluru. Since the Eastern Wei Dynasty, Central Plains people regarded Uluru as a part of Shi Wei. During the Northern and Southern Dynasties to the Tang Dynasty, Wuluhou changed its position. The Ouluhou people recorded in Wei Shu recorded Gan River and Yarlung River. The Urolu people recorded in Old Tang Book moved southward to Tong River With the Huolin River. Lack of literature basis, simply from the sound point of view derived from the name of Urho Hou and its later relations with the ancient tribes, modern national conclusion is difficult to gain the trust of people. Any practice of phonetic transcription, contrary to the scientific nature and seriousness of historical research, is not desirable.