简易逻辑内容在高中数学的地位不高,高考一般只有一道选择或填空题,所涉内容也比较单一,考来考去就是充当“外衣”的充分、必要条件.如果简易逻辑教学纯粹以高考为目标,那么只要把充分性、必要性弄清、弄透就够了,命题部分内容几乎可以忽略不计.但在实际教学过程中,想把命题部分内容讲清楚实属不易,那么对此部分内容到底是简单“过过场”——按照教材复述下,还是深入地去解读?笔者以为对大部分学生来说简单了解未必是坏事,但教师应该要有足够的“底气”去应付部分“难缠”的学生.下 Simple logic content in high school mathematics is not high status, the college entrance examination is generally only a choice or fill in the blank, the content is relatively simple, test to test is to act as “outer clothing ” If the simple logic teaching pure As long as the college entrance examination as the goal, then as long as the adequacy, necessity to clarify, get through enough, the proposition part of the content is almost negligible.But in the actual teaching process, the proposition part of the content to make it clear is not easy, Part of the content in the end is simple “over the field” - in accordance with the textual paraphrasing, or in-depth interpretation? I think for most students a simple understanding is not necessarily a bad thing, but teachers should have enough To deal with some “Uncomfortable ” students