论文部分内容阅读
“证明责任”堪称是民事证据制度中永恒的主题,但是在我国学术界却曾经一度受到了不应有的忽视,如今学界对证明责任的理解大多还停留在举证责任,即《民事诉讼法》条文的规定以及“谁主张,谁举证”的原则表述上。本文首先阐述了各国对证明责任含义的表述以及我国学界及实践中如何理解证明责任,再通过对罗森贝克等人的客观责任说的研究,得出对证明责任含义的理解,最后对我国立法及司法实践中如何认识证明责任提出了相关见解。
“Proof of responsibility” is the eternal theme in the system of civil evidence, but once in our academic circles it was once undisruptedly neglected. Nowadays, most scholars’ understanding of the burden of proof still lies in the burden of proof, namely “Civil The provisions of the Code of Procedural Provisions as well as the principle of ”who claims, who evidences". This article first elaborates on how each country states the meaning of the burden of proof and how to understand the burden of proof in the academic circles and practice in our country. Then through the research on the objective responsibility of Rosenberk et al., It comes to the understanding of the meaning of the burden of proof. Finally, And how to recognize the burden of proof in judicial practice.