论文部分内容阅读
对于《诗经》“风”“雅”“颂”分类 ,传统观点主要有“实用说”、“产地说”、“体象说”、“乐调说”四种。这四种观点分别揭示了《诗经》特质的一个方面 ,而不能作为划分风、雅、颂的统一标准。风、雅、颂的划分与编排当以内容的不同为标准。有关风土民情的归于“风” ,事关诸侯、士大夫的归于“小雅” ,事关周王的归于“大雅” ,关于古代明王祭祀之法、颂扬之章、祈祷之辞的归于“颂”。
For the classification of “Book of Songs”, “Wind”, “Ya” and “Ode”, the traditional viewpoints mainly include “Practicality”, “Place of Origin”, “Body Image Theory” and “Music Theory”. These four points of view reveal one aspect of the special features of The Book of Songs respectively, and can not be used as a uniform standard for dividing the wind, the elegance, and the praise. The division of the wind, the grace, the song and the arrangement when the different content as the standard. Concerned about the local customs and customs of the “wind”, related to princes, scholar’s attributed to “Xiaoya”, related to the week of the king attributed to the “Daya”, on the ancient Ming Wang worship of the law, praise the chapter, the prayer speech attributed to “praise” .