论文部分内容阅读
《考古》1994年2期所载《安徽繁昌发现三国吴将严圭铜洗》一文,介绍了安徽繁昌发现的五件铜洗,并据其铭文内容考证了孙吴黄武二年将军严圭率部在濡须拒破曹仁别将常雕的史实。但该文在器主考定和铭文释意上尚有可商榷之处。文中2号器主应即铭文所示之人——公孙汉本人,4号器的铭文“将军严圭士吴奠银”中虽提到严圭,但器主却应是严圭军中之士——吴奠。这旬铭文虽只有短短的8个字,但恰恰符合了孙吴其时尤其是军中铸
“Archeology” contained in 2, 1994, “Anhui Fanchang found that the three kingdoms Yan Gui copper wash” article, introduced Fanchang Chang found five pieces of copper wash, and according to the contents of the inscriptions Wu Jun Wu Wu Sun Wu two generals In Ru Ruo refused Cao Ren do not often carved the truth. However, the text in the main test and inscription interpretation is still open to question. In the article, the main device of No. 2 should be the person shown in the inscription - the inscription of Gong Sun-han himself and No. 4 device “Although Yan Kyu was mentioned in” General Kim Kyu-yin " - Wu Dian. Although this inscription only a short period of eight words, but precisely in line with the time of Wu, especially the military cast