论文部分内容阅读
媒体对司法行为的自由批评与法庭威信之间的冲突和传媒对终审前案情的报道和评论与刑事被告获公平审判权利之间的冲突是传媒与司法最重要的两大冲突。在规制二者的关系问题上,英美法系与大陆法系的做法有所不同,各有特点。本文在梳理两大法系典型国家对传媒与司法关系立法的基础上,对两大法系的立法进行了比较,最终提出解决我国传媒与司法冲突的相关建议。
The conflict between media’s freedom criticism of judicial acts and court’s prestige and the media’s coverage and comment on the pre-trial case’s merits and the criminal defendant’s right to a fair trial are the two most important conflicts in media and judiciary. In regulating the relationship between the two, Anglo-American legal system and the civil law practice is different, each with its own characteristics. On the basis of combing the legislation on the relationship between the media and the judiciary in the typical countries of the two major legal systems, this article compares the legislation of the two legal systems and finally puts forward some suggestions to solve the conflict between the media and the judiciary in our country.