《戊戌奏稿》一书于宣统三年(1911)在日木出版,内收康有为戊戌年间所上奏折20篇,编书序文5篇,历来被作为研究康有为及维新派变法思想、纲领和主张的基本依据.1973年,台湾学者黄彰健著《康有为戊戌真奏议》,于附录中对《戊戌奏稿》的“真伪”进行鉴定,认为除两篇外,书中奏折、序文皆系戊戌政变后重撰之作.黄的结论是正确的.但由于当财史料的缺乏和仅限于附带考订,黄著对该书的说明过于粗疏.除此之外,我国大陆史学界对《戊戌奏稿》“真伪”问题的提出则较晚.1981年中华书局出版汤志钧编《康有为政论集》,将《戊戌奏稿》全部作为真件收入.同年,陈凤鸣发表《康有为戊戌条陈汇录》一文,根据故宫博物院图书馆所藏光绪二十四年内府抄本《杰土上书汇录》(简称《汇录》),指出《戊戌奏稿》与康有为戊戌年进呈原稿有不同;次年孔祥吉著文,主要据《汇录》,结合其他清代文书档案,进一步分析“《戊戌奏稿》的改墓及其原因”,引起 The book “The Essay in 1898” was published in Japanese at Wood in the 3rd year of Xuantong (1911). It was accepted that there were 20 papers published during the Wu-Xu period and 5 articles prefaced in the Reformation of 1898. It has always been used as a study of Kang You-wei and the reformist ideology, . In 1973, Taiwanese scholar Huang Changjian, “Kang Youwei for the Reform Movement of 1898”, in the appendix of the “Zhu Xu play” the “authenticity” identified that in addition to two, the book memorial, the preface are all Huang Xu’s conclusion is correct, but because of the lack of historical data and limited to collateral examination, Huang’s description of the book is too coarse.In addition, the history of mainland China on the “Reform Movement of 1898 The issue of ”authenticity“ was later proposed by Zhonghua Book Company in 1981. In 1981, Zhonghua Publishing House published Tang Zhijun’s ”Theory of Kang Youwei’s Political Essays“ and all the ”Zhu Xu“ contributions as the true income. In the same year, Chen Fengming published a text entitled ”Kang Youwei Wu Shu Tan Shui Lu“ , According to the Palace Museum Library’s possession of Guangxu within 24 years of the Manuscript ”Jie Tu repost“ (referred to as ”remit“), pointed out that ”the play of Xu“ and Kang Youwei Wu Xu years into the original manuscript is different; the following year Kong Xiangji Text, mainly according to ” Reincarnation “, combined with other archives of the Qing Dynasty documents, further analysis,” “Repenties of the Hundred” and the Reasons "caused