论文部分内容阅读
19世纪末的法律社会化既导致了各国民法的修改,又促成了社会法的产生。除了制度变革外,认可人之社会决定性和法律进步性的新观念也产生于法律社会化现象之中。法国的自然法学家也顺应时势,用这两种新观念改造了自然法。其结果是产生了可变的自然法和法律社会主义两种思潮。主要由天主教徒提出的可变自然法反对此前占主导地位的永恒自然法理论,希望用关心经济上处于弱势地位者福利的主张改变自由主义、个人主义的法律解释,从而减缓社会矛盾,防止革命。法律社会主义则认为法学家应该从社会冲突中发现新的自然法主张,从而改变既有的法律本身,让大众的集体信念成为法律的真正创造者。
The socialization of law at the end of the 19th century led not only to the revision of civil laws in various countries but also to the emergence of social law. In addition to institutional changes, the new concept of the social determinacy and legal progress of the authorizers also arises from the phenomena of legal socialization. Natural jurists in France are also adapting to the times and using these two new concepts to reform the laws of nature. As a result, there are two kinds of currents of thought, namely, the law of natural law and the law of social change. The mutable natural law, mainly proposed by Catholics, opposes the previous eternal law of natural law that dominates the past, hoping to change the legal interpretation of liberalism and individualism with the idea of caring for those who are economically disadvantaged, thereby alleviating social conflicts and preventing the revolution . Legal socialism holds that jurists should find new natural law claims from social conflicts so as to change the existing law itself and make mass public beliefs become the true creators of the law.