论文部分内容阅读
有关致害人不明高空抛物侵权责任承担问题的争议,《侵权责任法》第87条的出台并没有使其终止,反而是引起了理论界和实务界更大的争议,各种观点莫衷一是。有观点认为该条是公平责任原则的体现,也有观点认为该条采用了过错推定和因果关系的推定。本文拟对当前的一些观点作浅要的分析,以法院如何适用第87条为出发点,以便能最大程度降低第87条所带来的负面影响。
In regard to the controversy over the assumption of the responsibility of causing unaccountable high-altitude parabolic tort to the victims, the introduction of Article 87 of the Tort Liability Act did not terminate it. Instead, it has aroused even greater controversy between the theoretical circles and the substantive circles. Some people think that this article is a manifestation of the principle of fair responsibility. Some people think that this article adopts the presumption of fault presumption and causality. This article is intended to provide a brief analysis of some of the current points of view, starting with how courts apply Article 87 so that the negative impact of Article 87 can be minimized.