责任人不明确的建筑物高空抛物致人伤害案件自重庆“烟灰缸案”等以来一直争议不断,《侵权责任法》第87条有明确的规定,但是该规定缺乏法理基础,也不符合情理。本文从建筑物高空抛物的概念入手,并阐述了笔者对于第87条的存在的一些问题。 Since the case of Chongqing Municipality’s “ashtray case” has been disputed continuously, the responsibility of people with unclear responsibility for parabolic and high-altitude injury caused by buildings has been constantly debated. Article 87 of the Tort Liability Act clearly stipulates that the provision lacks legal basis and neither In line with the reason. This article starts from the concept of building parabolic altitude and expounds some questions about the existence of Article 87.