论文部分内容阅读
我国宪法第67条第4款规定,全国人大常委会有权“解释法律”。法院组织法第33条规定,最高人民法院对于审判过程中如何具体应用法律、法令的问题,进行解释。《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于加强法律解释工作的决议》(以下简称《决议》)第2条规定,“凡属于法院审判工作中具体应用法律、法令的问题,由最高人民法院进行解释。凡属于检察院检察工作中具体应用法律、法令的问题,由最高人民检察院进行解释。最高人民法院和最高人民检察院的解释如果有原则性的分歧,报请全国人民代表大会常务委员会解释或决定。”这是法律上关于法律(包括刑法)解释的
Article 67, paragraph 4, of our country’s Constitution stipulates that the NPCSC has the power to “interpret the law.” Article 33 of the Organic Law of the Court stipulates that the Supreme People’s Court will explain how to specifically apply the laws and decrees in the trial. Article 2 of the Resolution of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress on Strengthening the Legal Interpretation Work (hereinafter referred to as the “Resolution”) stipulates that “the Supreme People’s Court shall explain the specific application of laws and decrees in the trial of the court. Belong to the procuratorate procuratorial work specific application of laws and decrees, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate to explain the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate to explain if there are differences of principle, submitted to the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress for explanation or decision. ”This is Legal interpretation of the law (including criminal law)