论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨腹部B超与阴道B超在异位妊娠诊断中的效果对比。方法:选取了2013年1月~2013年12月,在妇产科接受诊断治疗的异位妊娠病例130例,用单双数方法将130病例平均分为A组和B组,A组使用腹部B超进行检查,B组使用阴道B超进行检查。对病例使用B超诊断进行了回顾性分析,比较腹部B超和阴部B超在异位妊娠诊断中的疗效。结果:对两组病例采用不同的B超检查方法进行诊断以后,从结果对比中可以看出,B组使用阴道B超的诊断率较高为59例,符合比率为90.75%;使用腹部B超检查的A组病例诊断比率为76.92%。结论:阴道B超在诊断异位妊娠上准确率较高,较比腹部B超优势较多。
Objective: To investigate the effect of abdominal ultrasonography and vaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2013, 130 cases of ectopic pregnancy undergoing diagnosis and treatment in obstetrics and gynecology were selected. 130 cases were divided equally into group A and group B by single and double number method. Group A was treated with abdomen B ultrasound examination, B group using vaginal ultrasound examination. A retrospective analysis of the cases using B-ultrasound was performed to compare the efficacy of abdominal B-ultrasound and genitourinary B-ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Results: After the two groups of patients with different B-mode ultrasound diagnosis, the results can be seen from the comparison, B group using vaginal B-high diagnostic rate was 59 cases, the coincidence rate was 90.75%; the use of abdominal B- A group of patients examined the diagnosis rate was 76.92%. Conclusion: The accuracy of vaginal B-ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy is higher than that of abdominal ultrasound.