论文部分内容阅读
我国2012年修订民事诉讼法确立了诚实信用原则,但并不像大陆法系多数国家规定真实义务,我国采用了日本、韩国的立法例,将诚实信用原则作为一般规定写入民事诉讼法的第一章。但高度抽象的裁判规范犹如脱缰的野马,诚实信用原则一旦滥用,极可能侵害当事人诉讼权利,威胁民事诉讼最为重要的处分原则和辩论原则。日本采用这样的立法例具有深厚的理论基础、判例和司法实务经验的积累,其社会背景、法治发展的阶段也与我国有很大不同。我国将诚实信用原则作为一般条款加以规定的妥当性评价应持谨慎态度。
China’s 2012 Civil Procedure Code amended the principle of good faith but it did not provide the true obligations of most countries in the civil law system. Our country adopted the legislative cases of Japan and South Korea, and adopted the principle of good faith as the general provision in the Code of Civil Procedure A chapter. However, the highly abstract refereeing rules are like a runaway horse. Once the principle of good faith is abused, it is very likely to infringe upon litigation rights of litigants and threaten the most important disposition principles and debating principles of civil litigation. The adoption of such a legislative act in Japan has a profound theoretical foundation. The accumulation of judicial precedent and experience in judicial practice has its social background and stage of development of the rule of law also differs greatly from our own. Our country should treat the principle of good faith as a general provision to be cautious.