本文探讨从修辞批评视角进行批评话语分析研究的可行性和必要性,运用肯尼斯·博克的认同理论解析范·戴克提出的新闻语篇修辞框架,并选取《纽约时报》的一则报道进行例证分析。该研究发现新闻修辞框架的表层是劝服手段,底层则是意识形态的载体和组织方式,报道者主要通过两种无意识认同——“误同”和“移情认同”令受众既能相信报道的客观真实性,同时又能接受其立场、观点和意识形态。 This article explores the feasibility and necessity of criticizing discourse analysis from the perspective of rhetorical criticism. It analyzes the rhetorical framework of news discourse proposed by Van Dyck using the Kenneth Boke theory of identity and selects a report from The New York Times Illustration analysis The study found that the rhetorical framework of the news rhetoric is persuasion on the surface and the underlying is the carrier and organization of ideology. The reporters mainly use two types of unidentified identities - “error” and “empathy” to make the audience Can not only believe the objective authenticity of the report, but also accept its position, view and ideology.