论文部分内容阅读
对于责令停止违法行为,反垄断执法机构应当通过做法示范指引促进机制和合规自证报告保障机制来共同推进经营者积极采取措施进行有效整改。对于没收违法所得的处罚,反垄断执法机构应当将违法所得的范围限定在经营者因垄断行为而获得的超额利润上,至于具体数额应由当事人进行充分举证,反垄断执法机构则有权依据自身的合理怀疑对此进行自由裁量。对于并处行政罚款,比例自由裁量模式与损害赔偿折算模式各有利弊,从保持执法公平性与行政罚款的深层属性上看,采损害赔偿折算模式更为妥当。但依现行的执法条件,可暂允许采用比例自由裁量模式作为过渡,在此过程中反垄断执法机构应当统一会计年度、营业额、罚款比例的选择标准。
For the order to stop the illegal act, the anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies should guide the implementation of the mechanism to promote mechanisms and self-reporting compliance mechanisms to jointly promote the operators to actively take measures to carry out effective rectification. For penalties for confiscation of illegal income, the antitrust law enforcement agencies shall limit the scope of illegal income to excess profits obtained by the operator due to monopoly behavior. The specific amount shall be fully evidenced by the parties and the antitrust law enforcement agency shall have the right according to its own Reasonable suspicion of this discretion. For the concurrent administrative fines, the proportional discretion model and the compensation model for damages have their advantages and disadvantages. From the perspective of maintaining the fairness of law enforcement and administrative penalty, it is more appropriate to adopt the mode of compensation for damages. However, under current law enforcement conditions, the proportionate discretionary model may be temporarily allowed to take the transition. In this process, the antitrust law enforcement agencies should unify the selection criteria for fiscal years, turnover and fines.