“家电下乡”这一政策本身无可厚非。遗憾的是,该项善意的诤谏正走向无序,并且似乎一时间找不到逆转的良方。作为大三农政策的一部分,4万亿经济刺激计划涵盖了向广阔农村输送商品消费补贴的指导思想,家电——更为广义的是3C承担着其中的主要角色。有非官方的研究指出,该项计划从启动之初即不可避免地面临四大拷问:中间层利益链的管控、不同地区补贴的均衡、实际供需关系的调研、惠农与内需的关联统计。更深层的考虑在于,面对全球经济不景气影响下的贸易保护主义倾向,政府及国内产业界究竟应当将该项计划视作短期应急方案,还是将其作为后危机时代中国经济从根本上摆脱政府主导下的外向型桎梏、继而革新为内生型供需生态的契机?就国家动员能力而言,中国政府毋庸置疑冠绝全球,除了上层建筑的强大号召力,更有自先秦以降的深层儒学影响。欧洲及中近东地区历史上曾经有过拜占廷及亚历山大,但君主立宪制最终被边缘化,欧陆的分而治之格局也使得西方政治没可能达成中央集权。利弊姑且不谈,在人类迎战史无前例的经济危机时,我们至少可以从宏观层面看到二者效率的高下立分,但同样需要警惕微观领域的公平与公正性——这是一个始终存在巨大争议的敏感话题。许多时候,我们困惑于制度与文化之间的背离:一方面,国民在马不停蹄地执行全球化,而决策层却对部署效率与公平的“融合”缺乏足够的耐心和重视。实事求是地说,政府在尝试将三公返还给国民之际,经济危机作为政策口径平台虽然再恰当不过,却为今后循序渐进的体制改良埋下了隐患。 “Home appliances ” This policy is beyond reproach. Regrettably, this good-hearted remonstrance is heading unordered and seems unlikely to find a cure for reversal. As part of the policy of implementing the “Big Three Farmers,” the 4 trillion yuan stimulus package covers the guiding ideology of delivering subsidies to consumers in vast rural areas. Home appliances - more broadly, 3C has a major role to play. Unofficial studies have pointed out that since the inception of the project, the plan has inevitably confronted with four major interrogations: the control of the middle-level interest chain, the balance of subsidies in different regions, the investigation of the actual supply and demand, and the statistics on the relationship between benefiting farmers and domestic demand. A deeper consideration is whether, in the face of the tendency of trade protectionism under the global economic downturn, whether the government and the domestic industries should consider the plan as a short-term emergency plan or basically eliminate China's economy as an era of post-crisis The government-led export-oriented economy, and then innovation as an endogenous ecological opportunities for supply and demand? In terms of national mobilization capacity, the Chinese government is no doubt that the global crown, in addition to the strong appeal of the superstructure, but also from the pre-Qin Confucianism influences. In the history of Europe and the Middle East, there were Byzantium and Alexandria. However, the constitutional monarchy was eventually marginalized. The continental divide and rule also made it impossible for western politics to achieve centralized power. Regardless of the advantages and disadvantages, we can at least see from a macro perspective the efficiency and disagreement between the two peoples in the face of the unprecedented economic crisis. However, we must also be vigilant about the fairness and fairness in the micro-sphere. This is a huge controversy Sensitive topic. Many times we are puzzled by the divergence between institutions and cultures: on the one hand, the national people are constantly implementing globalization while the decision-makers lack sufficient patience and attention to the “integration” of efficiency and fairness in deployment. To be realistic, as the government tried to return the three generations to the people, the economic crisis as a platform of policy calumny was appropriate, however, laying down a hidden danger for the gradual improvement of the system in the future.