论文部分内容阅读
海峡两岸投资协议是遵循两岸政治逻辑达成的经济协议。两岸特殊的政治经济和社会现实,不仅影响协议的法制化程度,而且还直接影响法院在处理投资争端时对法律概念的解释。法院在处理两岸投资者与政府间投资争端时,应当确保司法权的行使不干扰协议的政治套利,谦抑地维护裁判的公正性,运用目的性类比推理对法律概念作出符合情境需要的解释,使裁判结果符合两岸投资协议的目标。
The cross-Strait investment agreement is an economic agreement that follows the political logic of cross-Strait relations. The special political, economic and social realities on both sides of the Strait not only affect the legalization of the agreement, but also directly influence the interpretation of legal concepts by courts when handling investment disputes. When dealing with disputes over investment between the two sides of the Strait, the court should ensure that the exercise of judicial power does not interfere with the political arbitrage of the agreement, maintain the impartiality of the courtroom restraint modestly, and explain the concept of law in line with situational needs through the use of objective analogical reasoning. Make the referee’s result accord with the goal of cross-strait investment agreement.