《图书发行研究》1993年第2期和第4期发表了郑道启同志的短文《坚持“以需定进”的原则》和《再谈坚持“以需定进”的原则》(以下简称《再谈》)。第一篇短文和我写的《进货原则和要求的不适应性探讨》一文发表在同一期。编辑部把进货原则的两种不同观点“以销定进”和“以需定进”,同时刊出,意在争鸣。随后,郑道启同志,针对我的《探讨》一文,又写了一篇《再谈》的文章反驳。认真拜读后,我以为郑文有论点而没有论据,没有阐述什么是“以需定进”,郑文中唯一解释“以需定进”的定义只有四个字,是根据读者的“实际需要”。而对“以销定进”大加发挥:认为不符合先进后销的逻辑,还机械地认为,书没进,拿什 In the second and fourth volumes of 1993, Comrade Zheng Daogi published a book titled “Insisting on the Principle of Demanding Progress” and “Revisiting the Principle of Demanding” (“Redemption”) talk“). The first essay was published in the same issue with my article, ”Inadaptability of Purchasing Principles and Requirements.“ The editorial department of the purchase of the principle of two different views ”to sell into“ and ”need to be determined,“ while published, intended to contend. Subsequently, Comrade Zheng Daodao, in response to my article on ”Discussion,“ wrote an article refuting the ”talk again.“ After earnest reading, I thought that Zheng Wenyou argued that there was no argument and did not elaborate on what was ”to be determined by necessity.“ The only explanation of Cheng’s ”definition of what needs to be done“ is that it is based on the reader’s ”actual needs“ . On the ”Pin into the" great play: that does not meet the advanced sales logic, but also mechanically think that the book did not enter, Nash