论文部分内容阅读
反倾销制度被认为是贸易救济手段之一,旨在保护国内产业和国内就业。但它往往无法实现这些目的,甚至适得其反。同时,反倾销程序被大量滥用,成为国内产业获得市场势力、形成和维持卡特尔的工具,导致国际贸易扭曲和国内竞争破坏,让国内消费者承担巨额成本。应该利用国际舞台积极推动国际反倾销协定的修改,使其更加完善。同时可以利用反倾销实施国反垄断执法机关的竞争倡导机制促使其国内法的变革,并利用其反垄断执法机制对滥用反倾销程序的企业进行反击。
Anti-dumping system is considered as one of the means of trade remedies, aimed at protecting domestic industries and domestic employment. But it often fails to achieve these ends, even counterproductive. At the same time, the abuse of anti-dumping procedures has become a tool for domestic industries to gain market power and form and maintain cartels. As a result, distortions in international trade and domestic competition have been devastating, causing enormous costs to domestic consumers. The international arena should be used to actively promote the revision of the international anti-dumping agreement and make it more perfect. At the same time, we can make use of the competition advocacy mechanism of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies in anti-dumping enforcement agencies to promote the reform of their domestic laws and use their antitrust enforcement mechanisms to counterattack against those companies that abuse anti-dumping procedures.