论文部分内容阅读
在检察工作实务中,针对倒卖盗版图书的行为定性分歧较大,对该行为定性的不同影响到阶段性的检察决定不同,继而影响到以后的各个诉讼环节。针对此情况,笔者针对实务中遇到的一起案件,从三种分歧意见着手,深入剖析法律规定及法理,意图辨明非法经营罪、侵犯著作权罪及销售侵权复制品罪的本质区别,明晰实务中各自的适用条件,以期能够为检察实务中遇到类似问题的检察人员提供一些思路。
In procuratorial work practice, qualitative disagreements on the reselling of pirated books are relatively large in nature. The qualitative difference of this act affects the different stages of procuratorial decisions and hence the subsequent litigations. In view of this situation, the author of a case encountered in practice, proceed from three different opinions, in-depth analysis of legal provisions and jurisprudence, the intention to identify the crime of illegal business, copyright infringement and the sale of infringing copies of the essence of crime, clear practice Their respective conditions of application, in order to procuratorate personnel encountered similar problems in procuratorial practice to provide some ideas.