论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨健康教育对社区老年人提高预防及控制慢性心血管疾病能力的意义。方法选取95例社区老年人作为研究对象,按照编排号码的奇偶分为干预组(48例)和对照组(47例)。干预组采取健康教育进行干预,对照组采用普通宣传方式进行干预,观察两组临床疗效。结果干预组老年人及家庭成员对疾病知晓情况的熟知率分别为89.58%、97.92%,对照组老年人及家庭成员对疾病知晓情况的熟知率分别为72.34%、80.85%,两组比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预3个月后,干预组生活习惯总分为(67.92±3.01)分,对照组为(57.33±2.22)分,干预组生活习惯总分明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。干预6个月后,干预组各项生活习惯评分均高于对照组,干预组生活习惯总分明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预组病情恶化、6个月内住院次数>3次情况少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论社区实施健康教育对预防及控制慢性心血管发生与发展有深远的意义,能够提高患者乃至整个家庭的生活质量。
Objective To explore the significance of health education on community elders to improve their ability to prevent and control chronic cardiovascular diseases. Methods A total of 95 community-based elderly were selected as research objects. According to the parity of arrangement number, the intervention group (48 cases) and the control group (47 cases) were divided into two groups. The intervention group took health education to intervene, while the control group used the ordinary propaganda method to intervene, and observed the clinical curative effect of the two groups. Results The familiarity rate of the elderly and their family member in the intervention group was 89.58% and 97.92%, respectively. The familiarity rates of the elderly and their family members in the control group were 72.34% and 80.85% respectively. The differences between the two groups were Statistically significant (P <0.05). After intervention for 3 months, the total score of living habits in intervention group was (67.92 ± 3.01) points and that in control group was (57.33 ± 2.22) points, the total score of living habits in intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group (P < 0.01). After intervention for 6 months, all living habits scores in intervention group were higher than those in control group, and the total score of living habits in intervention group was significantly higher than that in control group (P <0.05). In the intervention group, the condition deteriorated, the number of hospitalizations> 3 times in 6 months was less than that in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion The implementation of health education in community has far-reaching significance in prevention and control of chronic cardiovascular diseases and development, and can improve the quality of life of patients and the whole family.