这实在是一个老生常谈的问题,却也成了我的困惑。这似乎是一个悖论:摄影难以代表真实,又不能逃离真实的宿命,它仿若古希腊神话中的悲剧英雄,和自己不可抗争的命运搏斗。一张照片,看起来实在太真了。如果不去深究,甚至可以鲁莽的看做是现实的证据。可是,摄影给出的信息又实在太有限。曾经,摄影将时间、空间暂停的能力宣称为自己的荣光,并让它迅速的在世界各地展示 This is really a cliché problem, but it has also become my confusion. This seems to be a paradox: photography is hard to represent reality, and can not escape real fate. It fights like the hero of tragedy in ancient Greek mythology and fights with its own irresistible fate. A photo that looks so real. If you do not go deep into it, you can even recklessly view it as evidence of reality. However, the information given by photography is too limited. Once, photography claimed the ability to pause in time and space as its own glory, and let it quickly show around the world