论文部分内容阅读
目的比较两种不同消毒方法对静脉采血皮肤消毒的效果的影响。方法将180例体检者随机分为常规组和对照组,常规组采用常规消毒法,对照组采用消毒后无菌棉签擦干法,观察两组体检者的消毒效果。结果对照组在消毒时间上明显快于常规组,但消毒效果远不如常规组,常规组的细菌培养阳性率为14.44%,而对照组为32.22%。结论健康体检静脉采血皮肤消毒应严格执行常规消毒法。
Objective To compare the effects of two different disinfection methods on the skin disinfection of venous blood collection. Methods 180 cases were randomly divided into routine group and control group. The routine group was treated by conventional disinfection method, while the control group was treated by sterilized cotton swab. The disinfection effects of the two groups were observed. Results The control group was significantly faster than the conventional group in disinfection time, but the disinfection effect was far less than that of the conventional group. The positive rate of bacterial culture in the conventional group was 14.44% compared with 32.22% in the control group. Conclusion Health examination venous blood sampling skin disinfection should be strictly enforced by conventional disinfection method.