论文部分内容阅读
《公司法解释三》第十七条创设了有限责任公司股东除名制度,明确股东未履行出资或抽逃全部出资情况下,经催告在合理期间仍未缴纳或返还的,公司可通过股东会决议解除该股东的股东资格,但是该条款对股东除名决议中拟除名股东行使表决权应否限制没有涉及。本文就此从法律续造角度,将其定性为“残缺式体系违反”中的全部残缺型法律漏洞,并采用“目的性限缩”的方式进行法律漏洞填补,从保障股东除名制度正常运转出发,得出应予限制该股东表决权行使的结论。这一过程系针对司法实践中法律漏洞填补缺乏规范思考方式的情况,按照法学方法论,严格遵循“法律解释与法律续造的甄别→法律漏洞的确定→漏洞填补方式的选择、试错、证成”之步骤进行的法律续造,对相关问题的解决具有方法论上的可借鉴性。
Article 17 of the “Company Law Interpretation III” The Company established the system of removing shareholders of limited liability companies, and if the shareholders fail to pay their capital contribution or withdraw all their capital contributions, they shall not be paid or returned within a reasonable period after being urged, the company may be dissolved by resolution of the shareholders’ meeting The shareholder qualifications of the shareholder, but whether the clause of this clause shall limit the exercise of voting rights of the shareholders to be removed from the resolution of the shareholders shall not be involved. This article from the point of view of legal system, it is characterized as “imperfect system ” in all incomplete legal loopholes, and “purpose limited ” way to fill in legal loopholes, from the protection of shareholders delisting system Normal operation, concluded that the shareholders should be restricted to exercise the voting rights conclusion. This process is aimed at the lack of normative ways of legal loopholes in the judicial practice. According to the jurisprudence of law, we strictly follow the principle of legal interpretation and legal renewal, the determination of legal loopholes, the choice of ways to fill in loopholes, trial and error Into "the process of legal continuation of the relevant issues to solve the methodology can be used for reference.