论文部分内容阅读
凯尔森之《纯粹法理论》乃当世西方名著,其人更是西方诸学者眼中的“当今法学之领军人物”。然,读中国法家哲学思想,不必深挖,凯尔森的纯粹法基本理论便一一显现。因此,便将中国法家哲学贴上了西方实证主义纯粹法的标签。此举绝非借凯尔森以提升法家之当今地位,只缘实不敢给西方之法学领军人物“法家”之称谓,毕竟两者思想并不完全雷同。本文尝试着比较两者基本的法理论来论证中国古代法家哲学的纯粹性。
Kelsen’s “Pure Law Theory” is a masterpiece of the Western world. His people are even more “leaders of current jurisprudence” in the eyes of Western scholars. However, reading Chinese legal philosophy, do not have to dig deep, Kelsen’s basic theory of pure law will be revealed one by one. Therefore, the Chinese legal system of law was labeled as the pure positivism of western positivism. This move is by no means Kelsen in order to enhance the legal status of the legalists, only marginally not dare to give the Western legal leader “Legalist” title, after all, the two ideas are not exactly the same. This article attempts to compare the two basic theories of law to prove the purity of the ancient Chinese legal philosophy.